the resident ,____had been damaged by the fire,were given help by red cross.A all of their homes B all their homes C whose all homes D all of whose homes 麻烦这里用不用of 的区别 是不是定语从句的问题?all whose homes可以吗

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/05/06 15:15:31
the resident ,____had been damaged by the fire,were given help by red cross.A all of their homes B all their homes C whose all homes D all of whose homes 麻烦这里用不用of 的区别 是不是定语从句的问题?all whose homes可以吗

the resident ,____had been damaged by the fire,were given help by red cross.A all of their homes B all their homes C whose all homes D all of whose homes 麻烦这里用不用of 的区别 是不是定语从句的问题?all whose homes可以吗
the resident ,____had been damaged by the fire,were given help by red cross.
A all of their homes B all their homes C whose all homes D all of whose homes 麻烦这里用不用of 的区别 是不是定语从句的问题?all whose homes可以吗

the resident ,____had been damaged by the fire,were given help by red cross.A all of their homes B all their homes C whose all homes D all of whose homes 麻烦这里用不用of 的区别 是不是定语从句的问题?all whose homes可以吗
答案选D all of whose homes
翻译:农民们,他们的房子都被洪水毁掉了,被红十字会救了.
all whose homes是一个短语,中心词是all,不能做非限定性定语从句的引导词
而all of whose homes得引导词就变成了whose,这个是可以引导非限定性定语从句的
of只是一般意义上的,而在这里就应具体情况具体分析,这不是考察可否省略of的,而是考察非限定性定定语从句的引导词的.

答案是D all of whose homes. all 是形容词,意思是所有的,当all修饰的是名词时,直接跟所修饰的名词。如果修饰的是代词的时候需要加of,表示范围和所属关系。

那么在这句话当中,在the resident后面用逗号隔开的那部分显然是一个非限制性的定语从句,是对主语the resident的补充说明,再设the resident跟home的...

全部展开

答案是D all of whose homes. all 是形容词,意思是所有的,当all修饰的是名词时,直接跟所修饰的名词。如果修饰的是代词的时候需要加of,表示范围和所属关系。

那么在这句话当中,在the resident后面用逗号隔开的那部分显然是一个非限制性的定语从句,是对主语the resident的补充说明,再设the resident跟home的关系是所属关系,所以选用whose homes的用法。如果答案用all whose homes 那么就是把whose homes作为已知的名词,但事实在whose只是一个引导词,所以必须在all 后面加上of 表示所属关系。

希望我的解释能对你有所帮助

收起